
I would love to see a biopic about Frantz Fanon. His work has influenced thinking on decolonisation and colourism and his seminal “Peau noire, Masques Blancs” (Black Skin, White Masks) is one of the most passionate and persuasive works I have ever read.
I read parts of it over again and I noticed new points that I missed the last time. In his chapter about the black woman and the white man, he asks an almost sarcastic question that says “Qu’ y a-t-il de plus illogique, en effet, qu’une mulâtresse qui épouse un Noir”? (My translation: Is there anything more illogical than a mulatto who marries a Black man?). I find this question intriguing. Fanon wrote this work in 1952 where colourism thrived in his island of Martinique. No doubt, it is still at large today but did people truly marry based on shades and moreover were light-skinned women determined to marry light skinned men like them too? In this chapter, Fanon seems to argue that in his society, the shade of a black person determined their behaviour. He notes the synopsis of a book by another author that states the “negress” had one worry in her head: to become white whereas the mixed race woman wanted to become white and to avoid regression.
I don’t take offence to Fanon analysing black women through the prism of shadism simply because it is a reality for black people, every day and everywhere that we live. It must have really twisted knickers this book because he is opening up wounds. He also argues that the negress feels inferior so she aspires to be part of the “white” world. The statement rings true when we bring up the topic of beauty. Many black women still want admission into the world of “light is right” by using skin lightening creams. Are women who use skin lightening creams putting a white mask on their black skin? Fanon’s work is so relevant today. His chapter on the black woman is an attempt to try and understand and I think black men and women need to make more attempts to understand each other.
Do black men actually want to understand black women? That is the question in itself. Are depictions of black women by black men truthful or stereotypical? Here is an English translation of the poem “Femme Noire” (“Black Woman”) by Leopold Sedar Senghor:
What are your thoughts about this poem? Does objectify black women? Some people think Senghor is talking about the black woman as a metaphor for Africa itself. I think he has sexualised the black woman in order to show how colonialism in itself has taken advantage of Africa.
4 Comments
02/07/2007 at 13:21
I never heard of blue vien societies , but growing up there was a faction of upper class blacks that were lightskin and married lightskin . During thier working hours , they integrated into white society ( not passed , but use thier chances as stepping stones to gain knowledge on the system and make it work for them ..) At least i think that is how they saw it . Because during thier personal parties , they did not want white people to attend. I know this as I grew up with a friend from cananda who was white but stepfather was jamaican , she lived very close to one family like this / The family associated with her mother everyday but when it was time for personal events ( family ) she was never invited and very hurt about this .
I have never read Crouch , but have read dr henrik clarke’s essays on decolonization . I think your quote below , is on target !!!
“Colour has shaped how black people see themselves because the kaleidoscope of colour has not been destroyed.”
28/06/2007 at 20:09
Asa — Thanks for the link! I think Fanon’s words are hugely important for black people today.
ByrdParker — You have raised some excellent points. Your octaroon theory is on POINT. Have you heard of blue vein societies? apparently they originated from new england and only light-skinned black people who one could see “blue veins” were admitted entry. I find that indeniably puzzling yet can it be applied to the hip hop/rnb industry…? perhaps.
That point you made about a ruling class of black people with white skin is very interesting. Perhaps that is the bottom line. Class to an extent for the black diaspora is judged by the colour “white” just proving that all those black people who consistently argue about being colour-blind must be aware that colour is still a subtext for global society. Colour has shaped how black people see themselves because the kaleidoscope of colour has not been destroyed.
Are there any thinkers with good theories on decolonisation and race besides Fanon? I have heard a lot about this African-American author Stanley Crouch but I heard he does not like Toni Morrison. Do you know much about him?
28/06/2007 at 14:02
love fanon , and would like to see a biopic .
He deffinitly had interesting theories..
aulelia said
In this chapter, Fanon seems to argue that in his society, the shade of a black person determined their behaviour. He notes the synopsis of a book by another author that states the “negress” had one worry in her head: to become white whereas the mixed race woman wanted to become white and to avoid regression.”
Byrdparker says
During that time , and in that space fanon’s thinking is correct and sort of frightening . Imagine being black with a darker skin and just obsessing over being white … In my oppinion People in general have this fanaticism trait in thier genes, they latch on to an idea and become obsessed , thinking of nothing else , the reason de etre is missing .. This type of fanaticsim is also now being carried out in blogs. I would like to call it crowd thought power..
aulelia said
” I find this question intriguing. Fanon wrote this work in 1952 where colourism thrived in his island of Martinique. No doubt, it is still at large today but did people truly marry based on shades and moreover were light-skinned women determined to marry light skinned men like them too?
byrdparker saids
And unfortunately yes this point is true from my experience in America , growing up there were more upperclass blacks that were lightskin , they all hung out together ( these blacks were not half white , the white in thier family was probably ushered in during the slave times ) . During work / school time , they integrated into white society . But on thier own time they wanted nothing to do with whites , however they also wanted nothing to do with darker skin or poor blacks , at some parties you would be amazed all the guests were lightskin. I am sure if a white person had a chance to partake in one of these events they would not have thought some of the people were white. These lightskin blacks also had political thoughts for ” the people” and they were not in love with white people …. This sort of phenomena was carried out through most old black citites. So yes I would say people married based on color at one time , I like to call it the octaroon theory . Blacks saw that whites had everything , even the slaves who had babies by thier masters saw thier children’s status elevated. It’s was about creating a ruling class of black with white skin .. I think one good example of this is haiti.
In regards to the poem , i think or at least hope he is talking about africa… But if africa is a woman , how come all the leaders are men !
27/06/2007 at 18:09
Nice post. Deep. I need to add Fanon on my re-read list.
The poem reminds me of a passage from the “Song of Solomon”. An ode to a lover:
http://asabagna.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/valentine%e2%80%99s-day-expression-of-love-to-my-wife/